Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2532)	7/24/1999 4:27:00 PM
From: pz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Bill, <<<The GUMM stock promotion fraud will eventually, and inevitably, trade significatnly lower. I reiterate my STRONG SELL/SHORT SELL recommendation.>>> What is your personal position in GUMM, if you are short, at what price? Paul

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (2532)	7/24/1999 9:34:00 PM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

<I reiterate my STRONG SELL/SHORT SELL recommendation.> LOL Bill. Who do you think you are, an analyst for Merrill Lynch? LMAO. If you were, you would have been fired for getting the company in trouble for libel. Let's face it. Any small-timer that is dumb enough to listen to you and try to short GUMM probably can't find stock to borrow. Anybody who is long gives you absolutely zero credibility because you haven't provided any sound reasons for them to sell their stock much less short it. The people who own enough GUMM to move it down if they sold wouldn't give you the time of day with your piss-poor "analysis". I have talked to people who own 15,000, 20,000, 50,000, and 300,000 shares of GUMM. Do you really think anyone who owns that much GUMM hasn't done their homework? The person who owns 300,000 shares is the former CEO, Dick Ratcliff. A short seller on Yahoo posted some BS a few months ago that Mr. Ratcliff was shorting against the box because his stock was restricted and he couldn't sell it on the open market. I called Mr. Ratcliff and he told me that the only time he has ever sold GUMM was to pay part of his taxes. He gave me his permission to post that I spoke to him, that he said he has never shorted GUMM, that he believes in the long term future of the company, and that he plans to hold his stock. Short sellers have been posting lies and nonsense about GumTech since the stock was at 5. The longs just said you're full of it and have bid the stock up based on the future for nicotine gum and Zicam. If you want credibility, then post something credible. So far all you have posted are negative buzz words and libelous accusations that aren't supported by any evidence whatsoever. Your sell reiteration is a joke. Good luck with your losing short position. The daily, weekly, and monthly charts are all very bullish and I understand some funds have been buying the stock recently. Dan