Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Fat Client & Thin Server -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stormweaver who wrote (5)	7/24/1999 9:30:00 PM
From: RTev	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20

It seems to me that we're moving in two different directions, but neither of them is the fat client/thin server world you envision. On the one hand we have fat servers and fat clients. On the other are side are fat servers and thin clients that serve specialized purposes -- "information appliance" in current parlance. Why are the servers getting so much fatter? It probably partly because Sun, Microsoft, IBM, Novell, Oracle and all the other companies that sell servers or their components know they can get extra bucks for extra features. But there's more to it than that. Part of it is being driven by customer needs. IT organizations noted some time ago that it's expensive to maintain all those fat clients that they've deployed onto desktops. As always, the IT folks have created an acronym for the problem: TCO (Total Cost of Ownership). The response from vendors to high TCO has been to add features to the server that attempt to rein it in through things like systems management software and directory services. That's only one aspect of it, of course. You mention that a db would probably reside on your thin client, but where would the processing be done? Servers now become ever bigger and faster so that they can handle the transactions needed to feed only the requested data to the client. Are you suggesting that they should become dumber and let each client download all the data needed to process a query or other transaction? I just don't see any reason now or in the near term for servers to become simpler.