SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dayuhan who wrote (3233)7/24/1999 11:07:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 4711
 
Gee, I'm getting paranoid...Am I on anyone's list(s)? Did I make it?? Is this like being bookmarked??

Oh, dear, the suspense....this not knowing....<g>

Joan



To: Dayuhan who wrote (3233)7/24/1999 11:08:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 4711
 
As a sophisticated user of the language, do you strive to make your writing correct
or do you strive to make it beautiful?


Must it be an either-or? But if it is, the answer depends on who I'm writing for, and why. A legal brief, correct. An essay, beautiful. A letter to my wife, beautiful. A letter to my insurance agent, correct. Messages on SI, generally correct, since beautiful generally takes more care, and these are one-shot quickies, hit 'em and move on.

Do you think the two are the same? No. But you can do both in the same message. That's what distinguishes great from good writing. EB White wrote very correctly but also very beautifully.

Is the use of "dialogue" or "expertise" as verbs aesthetically pleasing, to your ear? Dialogue, yes in certain contexts. Expertize (the preferred spelling of the verb form) no. (I would point out that I did not use expertise; it was used by somebody else, and I was challenged to find a justification for it, which I did.)

I have flexible mental lists of the people on SI who I feel write well. These are the
people whose writing I like to read, regardless of what they are writing about,
whose writing is as pleasing to the ear as good music. I also have a flexible mental
list of those who consider themselves sophisticated users of the language. The lists
are not the same.
I would agree. But I also don't look for or expect good writing on most threads here. In my own case, my writing benefits from major editing. My first drafts of anything more than a simple letter almost always need editing. My writing technique is to get a lot of words and thoughts on paper (or on screen) and then go back and rework the thoughts and language. (White was that way -- he would often go three or four or more drafts of his work. Asimov, on the other hand, almost never rewrote. It's just a matter of how one's mind works.) I don't spend time editing most posts here, so most of what's here is far from my best writing. I assume that's true for many others here, so I tend to judge what's here by content rather than style.