Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: truedog who wrote (1879)	7/25/1999 11:26:00 PM
From: chalu2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Post #1873 was just speaking generally about conspiracy theorists. It had no reference to your previous posts, which obviously did not mention LBJ, Marilyn Monroe, or the other stuff. Everything I write is not about you.

To: truedog who wrote (1879)	7/25/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: chalu2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

I guess what I have a bit of trouble with is the word "provoked" used in connection with the U.S. refusing to feed the Japanese war machine any further. What possible moral guidepost could have supported continuing to supply these monsters? I think a thousand treaties should have been broken before we even considered sending more money or oil to the murderous Tojo and his henchmen. If this is provocation, then perhaps this provocation represented FDR's finest hour. As to Pearl Harbor--of course, it was an obvious military target, and was at risk of attack at any time. Any attack would have drawn us into war; all of the boats were not needed there for that. No one can explain why FDR would set up our Pacific Fleet in that manner (the Japanese were very adept at attacking ships at sea). And if no one can explain why FDR would act insanely, then there is no need to disprove your theory. It just does not--and cannot--make any sense.