SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yousef who wrote (66676)7/26/1999 1:59:00 PM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574004
 
Yousef Re <<Please stop being "foolish", Mani ... You know that the yield at 500mhz will be higher than at 550mhz or 600mhz>>

I never said that anything contrary to that. I challenged your initial statement that "AMD struggles with bin yield problems". Lower speed are usually higher volume initially, that does not mean "struggle". It may be true but you don't know that unless you got some inside info, I doubt that.

Mani



To: Yousef who wrote (66676)7/26/1999 2:48:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574004
 
Yousef,

You know that the yield at 500mhz will be higher than at 550mhz or 600mhz

And how do we know this?

Scumbria



To: Yousef who wrote (66676)7/26/1999 3:57:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Respond to of 1574004
 
Yousef - RE: "You know that the yield at 500mhz will be higher than at 550mhz or 600mhz. My point was that the 500mhz part will be the high volume part and will have to compete against the PIII."

What makes you so sure of that?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News