SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam Bose who wrote (137894)7/28/1999 7:45:00 AM
From: Calvin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Earnings report a test for new Compaq CEO
By Joe Wilcox
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
July 28, 1999, 4:00 a.m. PT

news.com

........Rumors circulated last week that Compaq might be sitting on four weeks' worth, its dealers another four weeks. Direct manufacturers, such as Dell typically have less than a week's inventory on hand.........

........."I wouldn't be surprised that Compaq has excess inventory and that they would sit on it rather than flooding the channel," said Lindy Lesperance, analyst with Technology Business Research. "Instead of shipping it this quarter, coming up with better earnings and coming short in the next quarters."...........




To: Sam Bose who wrote (137894)7/28/1999 9:05:00 AM
From: eddie foree  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
re: analysts and pc market..spring of 99...much too much damage done by them to the entire sector by casting doubt that consequently was blabbed about daily on cnbc..dell got hit harder than the others by this negative wash..we all know the story..the analysts were proven wrong...however the damage was already done..yes some of the attitudes have changed but it was hell to pay and you know it..many of us lost money because of it..dell is still along way recovering..and no where near its high of 55 yet...etc. etc. etc...



To: Sam Bose who wrote (137894)7/28/1999 9:09:00 AM
From: Mohan Marette  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 176387
 
INSTANT VIEW - U.S. durable goods rose 0.3 percent

Sam:
If you are interested in this sort of thing.This thing should ease the concern of an interest rate hike in Aug at least to some extent.

=================

NEW YORK, July 28 (Reuters) - Following are comments from economists and market experts after the U.S. Commerce Department reported that durable goods orders rose 0.3 percent in June after a revised 0.8 percent rise in May.

Durables excluding transportation fell 0.4 percent in June after falling a revised 1.4 percent in May.

Economists surveyed by Reuters had predicted, on average, that the orders for durable goods would rise 1.0 percent while orders excluding transportation would gain 0.7 percent. (Mohan: So much for the damn economists!)

PHIL HILL, ECONOMIST, BRIEFING.COM:

''This is much weaker than we or the market expected. It was a transportation story, as the ex-transport number was -0.4 percent. Transportation was up 2.7 (percent). It doesn't look like the bond market is doing much of anything on it. The Greenspan thing is still a factor, and he has the market so freaked out it's going to react more to bad news than to good news.''

MITCH STAPLEY, CHIEF FIXED INCOME OFFICER, KENT FUNDS:

''This is a good surprise to the market if you want lower interest rates. Industrial machinery and equipment is down for the first time since January. This report shows the unevenness in the recovery of the manufacturing sector. We were looking for a one percent increase overall. To come in at 3/10 of a percent takes a bit of the pressure off the Fed so far as a hike at the August (Federal Open Markets Committee) meeting goes.''

KATHLEEN STEPHANSEN, SENIOR ECONOMIST AT DONALDSON, LUFKIN AND JENRETTE SECURITIES CORP:

''It's a fairly weak report, it's negative. I think the Fed is not likely to tighten in August, and this would support that contention. The report is not going to change anything in terms of the outlook, and it's not going to do much to the monetary policy. Tomorrow's numbers are much more important.''

(Note: this article is ''in progress''; there will likely be an update soon.)