Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bux who wrote (323)	7/28/1999 3:37:00 PM
From: KyrosL	Respond to of 13582

Bux, why do you need a separate headset and microphone. You can build the headset into the handset. The handset already has a microphone and when you use it as a headset its mike will be close enough to your mouth. When you want to surf the net you stick it next to your eye instead of next to your ear... K

To: Bux who wrote (323)	7/28/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: Ramsey Su	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

Bux, so when is Qualcomm going to be the NEW COMPANY, or do we long term QC investors have to look else where? A few years ago, there was a forum hosted by Bill Frezza and frequented by the likes of Ira, Maurice, Merryman, Chris Reeder etc, debating how CDMA defies the law of physics <ggg>. Not being an engineer myself, it is my understanding that wireless will NEVER be superior to some type of wired system, such as fibre optics. Fortunately, the desire to be mobile gives CDMA a huge market. Regardless of what this device may be, is it safe to assume that we will have a lightning speed device at home (and/or office) and a wireless device that we can synchronize at a continuous basis? Is it premature to think about the role that QC will play in this arena? I opine that without some quantum leap, QC is fully valued as a handset, ASICs and royalty company. Not that it will not continue to reward investors, just that it will not be in the same magnitude as it did so far this year. At what point, if ever, should the New Qualcomm be focused in the same manner as this thread below? Subject 29380 Ramsey