SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cirruslvr who wrote (66804)7/28/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: Wally Mastroly  Respond to of 1578238
 
Key testing results for AMD's Athlon due soon - from News.com:

news.com



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (66804)7/28/1999 4:10:00 PM
From: Burt Masnick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578238
 
Product/process intros often slip in high tech industry.

The initial projected date is an estimate - often an optimistic one.

There are good reasons to set a date.

Focusses action & sets goal. Allows budgets to be set.

More often then not, the goal date slips as reality trumps hope.

Sometimes marketing pushes for an aggressive date.

Sometimes technologists get overoptimistic.

Sometimes management pounds a table.

It happens to AMD. It happens to Intel. It happens to everyone.

Everyone.

It isn't good. It isn't helpful. But it is Real Life 101.

If it happens too often and it's too large, bad things happen.

If it's too late it's irrelevant and maybe less/un profitable.

A pissing contest over who is later is silly.

What matters in semiconductors is yield, volume, margins

Not necessarily in that order.

AMD K7 systems will appear.

The real question now for AMD will be yield, volume, margins.

Bin splits will be important too.

The really big question this fall will be Dresden.

Being late there will REALLY hurt. Max Pain. Expense without income.

On time, it's a horserace. Late, it's gonna be agony.

Product/process intros often slip in high tech industry.



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (66804)7/28/1999 4:31:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578238
 
Re: "Intel was supposed to have >600MHz chips on Oct. 24. Why don't you brag about that?"

I don't want to brag about foils. You guys have that one down pat. BTW >600MHz by Oct 24 could still happen. Or I could do a Scumbria and claim it already did happen.

EP