Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hunterbob who wrote (25936)	7/29/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Hunter, I take it that you are saying that although the Samsung data indicates RDRAM system latency to be better than that of PC100 or PC133 for "the single case of a page hit" it is worse, or at the least no better, for the "many other timing scenarios" . Could you explain why. I'm just saying that there really isn't much difference between the raw latencies of different DRAM types. They all use the same DRAM cores, and are all very slow compared to the SRAM used in caches. Scumbria