SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (66913)7/29/1999 7:48:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574610
 
Re: "In what, SPECfp and SPECint? Where are the benchmarks???
What happened to not liking it when others talked about foils?
Has Cuontimemine brought an about-face in your attitude towards unannounced processors?"

My point exactly. <G>

Re: "you should be reminded that AMD ran their benchmarks on a non-Athlon optimized compiler. "

How do you know this when AMD has refused to provide details of the vapor-marks they showed on their foils?

Re: "so what Intel will probably do is use SSE as someone earlier stated. "

I expect they will. What's wrong with that?

EP



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (66913)7/29/1999 8:49:00 PM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574610
 
<As it appears, the MIA-thlon will barely squeak out a small lead over Coppermine in FPU>

Few posts back Elmer attributed CuMine coming close to Athlon in FP performance due to "Intel compiler improvements". Need I say more?

Kap


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News