To: ColleenB who wrote (40078 ) 7/30/1999 9:55:00 AM From: wlcnyc Respond to of 43774
"You're wrong Bill. When a PABN/PRWT long uses the incident as a back drop to post threats to those who oppose misinformation posted about this company, it becomes a part of the thread and discussion. " My statement still stands....perhaps with a slight modification..... "In no way do I believe that a discussion of the incident in Atlanta belongs on this thread." It does not belong here as a "threat" or to be used to promote an agenda. I should have added - as a means to promote anyone's agenda at least until all the facts are known and they prove to be truly relevant. BTW, I think the following part of the above quote is a bit inflammatory....perhaps intentionally so.... "....those who oppose misinformation posted about this company,.. " How about, "..those who have opposing views about information posted about this company..." IMO, that is more realistic. "What rush to judgement am I guilty of? " How about this statement... "I think it's just what a bunch of posters needed to see, to see what their behavior begets and encourages. " Time will tell if such behavior had any real connection to the tragedy or not. I admit, that after that you did change your focus from the tragedy itself, to the effect of it on Insider Trading and PABN. In other words, you made a pretty smooth transition back to your agenda and attacks on opposing views and other posters. "I would think that my local coverage here has kept me quite current and better informed than those of you outside the area. " I have some doubts about the reality of that statement, but I certainly am not going to argue one way or the other. I do hope that the truth is revealed to the "locals" as well as the rest of us outsiders, without further sensationalism. Bill