Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cm who wrote (8524)	7/31/1999 9:36:00 AM
From: Klingerg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

cm..From initial PGE Rpt. of 7/9/99 by S. Olson, CFA "....Wave Systems has developed a chip-based, client-side engine for electronic commerce and content distribution services. The Company's goal is to transform PC's and other network clients into secure platforms for the delivery of e-services from Wave and third parties. The primary service, Wave Direct, opens a new distribution channel for consumer software. Wave has agreements with several content providers, including Electronic Arts, GT Interactive, and Cendant, who are attracted to Wave Direct due to its flexible pricing models and direct contact with consumers....." ---From report, Pg. 1, 1st paragraph, 'Summary and Investment Recommendation:' Later..Klingerg P.S. From RB--- By: keV Reply To: 57998 by gold_dubloons Saturday, 31 Jul 1999 at 3:12 AM EDT Post # of 58011 Ted...Re;Earnings Report PG&E has a neat report: If you want a copy of PGE's research just e-mail hallahan@jcir.com and she will send you a copy.

To: cm who wrote (8524)	7/31/1999 11:04:00 AM
From: Sr K	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11417

<<... recall Nolan Bushnell's recent quote, "Of particular relevance to my background and focus is Wave's ability to support micro-transactions that enable the reality of the "pay-for-a-play" arcade to come to the Internet." ..>> 1. NB perhaps tried to say the opposite: My background and focus is of particular relevance to Wave's ability to support micro-transactions that enable the reality of the "pay-for-a-play" arcade to come to the Internet. Who cares if it is relevant to his background? We care if it is relevant to WAVE or a portion of WAVE's business. I think the misstatement is significant. 2. "Wave's ability"? ... better Wave's intended or expected ability. 3. I think GNET may have a strategic plan in this area.