Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The New Iomega '2000' Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amadeo Mendez-Vigo who wrote (2057)	7/31/1999 2:16:00 PM
From: Brian Cunningham	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5023

>>we can get those people who have only one motivation -- to ruthlessly make money at the expense of others -- out of our communities<< You've got to be kidding me! Given how blatantly obvious those behind "Rocky" have been, you've have to conclude Mr Levitt is full of hot air.

To: Amadeo Mendez-Vigo who wrote (2057)	7/31/1999 10:53:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5023

>>...we can get those people who have only one motivation -- to ruthlessly make money at the expense of others -- out of our communities.<< I wholeheartedly agree with you. The Iomaniac Hypesters who ruthlessly pump this IOM Garbage should be dealt with by the SEC. The Lies, Mistruths, and Irresponsible Promises and Predictions committed by Iomega Investors daily about Iomega returning to profitablity and their Vaporware products must be exposed for what they are... blatant attempts at Stock Manipulation in order to try and Pump the price of IOM higher. Hyping and Promoting Garbage like this belongs in some seedy Long Island strip-mall cold-calling Brokerage where it belongs, not in a respected public forum like SI. The Iomaniacal Scam of trying to Pump Up IOM stock will not succeed on MY watch! Plain and Simple: Iomega Corp. cannot fundamentally justify its current high share price (with a Market Cap at about $1.1 Billion), let alone an even higher price. --Especially not with Declining Zip Revenues, Declining Overall Revenues, No Profitability, Bombing New Products, and a Jaz line rapidly headed for the Dumpster.

To: Amadeo Mendez-Vigo who wrote (2057)	8/2/1999 2:54:00 PM
From: Kevin Linder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5023

Nobody takes Rocky seriously - probably not even Rocky. Let's face it, he does have some valid points otherwise IOM would be a stellar performer in the stock market. Where Rocky goes wrong is to continously vent the same old things over and over again. I (and I think most people) don't read his posts. Why would anyone pay Rocky when he is obviously so one sided in his arguments? And so one dimensional? I have not noticed one new thought from Rocky in the one or two years he has been on this thread - why does he keep posting then? I really don't know; don't care and never read his posts... Kevin Linder