Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (57803)	8/1/1999 7:17:00 AM
From: Pat W.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

If you can't indict a lawbreaker whose actions have been publicized around the world, how could you possibly enforce the law against anyone else? So then, how did you feel when the crime was lying under oath?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (57803)	8/1/1999 7:41:00 AM
From: Ish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<The simple facts are that 1) secretly taping phone conversations is illegal in Maryland >> The law in Maryland also says you can only be prosecuted if you knew it was illegal when you did the taping. <<2) Tripp secretly taped phone conversations in Maryland. So why shouldn't she be indicted? >> She was granted immunity by the Federal Government. <<If you can't indict a lawbreaker whose actions have been publicized around the world, how could you possibly enforce the law against anyone else?>> Are you asking about Clinton lying to Congress on national TV for 3 hours?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (57803)	8/1/1999 12:45:00 PM
From: Big Dan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

What's wrong with you? they didn't indict Slick-Willy!