To: Kent Rattey who wrote (698 ) 8/2/1999 1:01:00 AM From: Hank Stamper Respond to of 24042
"Telecommunications doesn't appear to be one of your strong suits. " You missed my point, I think. 1. I believe FO has one heck of a future. 2. We are only at the cusp of this future. 3. JDSU is at the very front of the phalanx. (And, the Huns' elephants are no where in sight.) 4. But, the business cycle has not been abolished. And, Mr. Market only pays extraordinarily high P/Es for limited time periods. I do not chase stocks, even this one, upward. That, in my opinion, is much too dangerous. Stock market history is on my side with regard to this point. Don't confuse a bull market for brains, is my motto. "You must think QCOM is really off the valuation charts. The banks and drugs stocks are cheap right now." I don't follow QCOM. As for the banks, for years were were in a period of dropping or stable inflation rates. Now, it is clear we are into a period of rising inflation. Traditionally this condition hurts bank earnings. I would not consider banks until the inflation picture looks different. Bad value now, IMO. Drug stock prices have not kept pace with the S&P, true. They may appear to be bargains. But when I looked into this just last week I found they are still above their historical average P/Es. Just because a stock is "cheap" in price does not mean it is a good buy until it is selling at a good value. I like to wait until something good goes on sale with good value. Why spend $200 on a pair of good shoes when you only have to wait and get the same pair for much less? I have expressed similar sentiments previously on this thread and it is clear that I and some others here simply do not see the problem of how to place value onto this company's stock the same way. I do respect your and other's opinions, I am simply much more value oriented and hence conservative in the present conditions in this stock and the broader market. Ciao, David Todtman