SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Net2Phone Inc-(NTOP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (308)8/2/1999 9:22:00 AM
From: Hawaii60  Respond to of 1556
 
I urge you to be more specific. What criminal activity? What organized ties. You write vaguely on purpose in order to spread innuendo and slander. If you don't have the guts to be specific. Then, I must assume you are just making things up in order to influance the stock price.

You have had no problem being specific with other companies when there really was a problem. Why stoop to making things up now. No one should have to make their living by spreading false rumors and attempting to manipulate stocks.

I feel sorry for you.



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (308)8/2/1999 9:22:00 AM
From: johnny grosso  Respond to of 1556
 
I am convinced that this A@P knows knothing. I have been on this thread from post one and some of the crap A@P has said is crazy. At first I was reconfirming info from press releases and the like, now I am just annoyed that the entire thread is about this idiot instead of NTOP. THis guy is a professional money losser--look at his record.

Good Luck, lOOK AT WHO ntop has deals with, look at market share, look at potential size of market. FOrget A@P



To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (308)8/2/1999 9:50:00 AM
From: gerard mangiardi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1556
 
AH your cute way with words again. now you say you believe there is criminal activity. But you don't say there are ties to organized crime. Saying what you believe is not the same as stating a fact. Its rather disingenuous of you to skirt the issue with semantics without verifying anything.