Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (67447)	8/3/1999 12:29:00 AM
From: Mani1	Respond to of 1574267

Elmer, Re <<...These samples perform very well, in fact they perform better than Intel's counterparts in most benchmarks. What you and the others disciples don't seem to realize is that this doesn't constitute a product. A product is something that can be manufactured in volume. There is no evidence that a product exists, or will exist in the foreseeable future...>> Good enough. I guess we will have to take a wait and see approach. Keep in mind that AMD never promised consumers will have a K7 by June. Earliest estimated date was July per sanders per CC ("as early as July"). Mani

To: Elmer who wrote (67447)	8/3/1999 1:08:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574267

<A product is something that can be manufactured in volume. There is no evidence that a product exists, or will exist in the foreseeable future.> I have here 3 questions for you: 1. What is YOUR definition of a "volume product"? 2. What is your criteria for product "existance"? 3. What is your timescale for "foreseeable future"? Let me guess that your answer will be that a "volume product exists" only if the company stock is appreciated 20 times over the next 15 years. Otherwise, in your definition, it is still a "foil". Right?