SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grainne who wrote (48857)8/3/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: Father Terrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
"The year 1995 matches 1990 as the hottest year on record."

Big deal. The records barely go back 100 years. The rest is speculation.



To: Grainne who wrote (48857)8/3/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: James R. Barrett  Respond to of 108807
 
1999 Christine Bartley found frozen to death in her garden.



To: Grainne who wrote (48857)8/3/1999 11:02:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Somebody sent me a jpg file (don't have it anymore) that was humorous. It showed a red&white flag flying from a palm tree and was captioned CANADIANS FOR GLOBAL WARMING.

On a serious note, E had an xlnt post here about global warming.
Message 10738506



To: Grainne who wrote (48857)8/4/1999 12:54:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 108807
 
Christine, Article...Global Warming is Nothing More than an Educated Guess...

Linda Bowles*

The Global Warming Treaty negotiated in Kyoto, Japan by the Clinton-Gore Administration is a scam. The involvement of the United States with a horde of other nations in a squirrelly scheme to fight global warming is based largely on a report issued by the United Nations in 1996. We now learn that a number of the scientists who helped prepare the report are upset because certain passages were edited out before publication. What was omitted was not incidental.

Included in the censored material are these disclaimers: "None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases . . . No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man-made causes."

The censored words tell the whole story, not only about global warming but about the integrity of the people who published the report. Science has a methodology for establishing scientific facts. The burden of proof is upon the researcher. From the perspective of science, the proof does not exist that global warming is real. Additionally, if one accepts as true that global warming does exist, there is no proof that man-made greenhouse gases have anything to do with it.

In a recent Gallup poll of members of the Meteorological Society and the American Geophysical Society, only 17% believed greenhouse gases caused warming in this century.

Global warming is nothing more than an educated guess by many of the same scientists who are still arguing about what happened to the dinosaurs. Perhaps we should think carefully before putting blind faith in people who cannot explain the simple disappearance of tens of millions of creatures, many of which were the size of locomotives.

What accounts for the confidence of the White House in an unproven and strongly disputed theory about greenhouse gases? We have a clue. In a speech to a group of religious leaders in 1991, Al Gore said the following, "We are not separate from the earth. God is not separate from the earth."

Gore's worship of the earth is in view. His fervor to protect the earth can now be understood in terms of his primitive faith and his New Age, geocentric perspectives.

In his book, Earth in the Balance (one of the Unabomber's favorite reads), Gore wrote, "We must make the rescue of the environment the central organizing principle for civilization."

Gore's holistic, eco-jingoism has led him to a "one world" view. His willingness to subordinate American sovereignty to the United Nations can now be understood.

The Global Warming Treaty calls for a reduction in greenhouse gases in the United States to 7% below 1990 levels by the year 2012. Assuming an average economic growth of 2.5% a year, the economy in 2012 will be over 50% larger than in 1990.

Thus, we are committing that by 2012 we will be using even less of the fuels that produce the so-called greenhouse gases than we were using 22 years earlier. These fuels include gasoline, coal, and oil, and account for 90% of the energy generated in the United States.

This could be catastrophic for our economy, our jobs, and our quality of life.

How would such a massive cutback be achieved? It would require increased government control of research efforts. It would require bigger taxes on fuel. It would require stern regulations governing industrial practices and onerous restrictions on private behavior and choices.

An already intrusive government would invade our liberties even further, taking charge of our lives in the name of what's good for us, telling us what to eat, what clothes to wear, what cars to drive, where to set our thermostats, how often to barbecue, when to turn out the lights, what to believe, and what to think.

China, Russia, India, Mexico, and more than 100 Third World countries are not included in the binding agreement, thus setting up even more incentives for American companies to move offshore.

All this to avoid a hypothetical problem! How will compliance be confirmed and how will noncompliance be punished? Will United Nations bureaucrats be crawling all over America inspecting our factories and fireplaces? How will success be measured? There is every reason to believe that if every country achieved its goals, there would not be a measurable effect upon global temperatures. Would that give rise to a call for even more stringent measures?

It is a socialistic dream come true. Socialist governments have historically solved problems by asking the people to make sacrifices and when the problems worsened, asking for even deeper sacrifices, including, eventually, the sacrifice of freedom itself.

It is madness.



To: Grainne who wrote (48857)8/4/1999 1:20:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Christine, Article.. 20th CENTURY TEMPERATURES ATOP MT. WASHINGTON..

Long-term continuous temperature records from remote areas away from the contaminating effects of rapid human population growth and associated land-use changes are of special interest in the greenhouse debate. One such long-term record from the northeastern United States comes from an observatory that has been operating continuously since 1932 at the summit of Mount Washington, New Hampshire. Given the quality and completeness of these records, the lack of any urban influence at the site, the analysis of climate variations at Mount Washington is useful in examining temperature trends (or lack thereof) during the period of historical records.

Mount Washington is located in the Presidential Range, New Hampshire, at 44°16'N, 71°18'W, with a summit elevation of 6,288 feet. While surrounding mountain ranges peak at about 4,000 feet, Mount Washington's elevation exposes its summit above the surrounding mountainous plateau. Its high elevation, unique exposure, and location along major storm tracks subjects Mount Washington to low temperatures, high winds, fog, rain, and snow throughout the year.

The Mount Washington Observatory, located on the summit, was founded in 1932 as a private, non-profit corporation to conduct scientific research and meteorological observations. The Observatory is the only fully-staffed, year-round alpine weather observatory in continental North America. Observations are taken by the staff members every three hours and the data are reported in near real-time to the National Weather Service. Reports consist of wind speed and direction, wet-bulb and dry-bulb temperatures, barometric pressure, relative humidity, precipitation, snowfall, and cloud cover.

All instruments and instrument locations used in this century at Mount Washington are approved, certified, and meet the specifications of the National Weather Service. All weather observations have been made within 200 feet of the geological summit of Mount Washington. Land-use changes in the immediate vicinity of the meteorological equipment have been minimal throughout the length of data collection. We obtained the minimum and maximum temperature data for the period 1939 to 1997 from the National Climatic Data Center and for 1998 data, we contacted the Observatory directly.

The weather atop Mount Washington may not seem normal to daily visitors, but climatological "normals" for the stations are certainly available (Hildebrandt and Balling, 1998). For example, in balmy July, the normal high temperature is 53.6°F while the low is 43.0°F. Before you get feeling too comfortable, be aware that the normal wind speed is 25.3 mph keeping the mid-summer daytime wind-chill factor well below freezing. And after such a pleasant summer experience, know that the normal high temperature in January is only 12.3°F with lows averaging –4.6°F. Add the normal wind speed of 46.2 mph, and you will find frostbite conditions occurring commonly at the summit. Over 250 inches of snow will fall in an average year, with all twelve months normally experiencing snowfall. And given the fog which persists greater than 70 percent of the time, cold temperatures, and high wind, much of the snow blows away and rime ice grows into the wind often two feet in length covering much of the summit and its buildings. In other words, if you are planning on staying atop Mount Washington, you may want to pack a few warm clothes!

If the normal climate does not seem harsh enough, the records are legitimate killers. The coldest temperature recorded on the summit is –47°F in January 1934; -46°F has been recorded many times at the Observatory. The highest wind speed is the infamous 231 mph on April 12, 1934, and every month through the entire record has seen hurricane-strength winds. The extreme low chill for all months is below –100°F. On the warm side, the highest temperature ever recorded at the station is 72°F reached many times, but never broken.

A plot of the 1939 to 1998 annualized mean, maximum, and minimum temperatures from Mount Washington is shown in Figure 1. The linear increase in mean temperature over the 60-year period is +0.28°F, +0.49°F for the minimum temperatures, and +0.07°F for the maximum temperatures. None of these changes are anywhere close to being judged statistically significant – in other words, we cannot say with confidence that there has been any change in the mean, maximum, or minimum temperature at this site since the Observatory began their operation in the 1930s.

Much of the world has seen a reduction in the diurnal temperature range, and this signal may be a response to the buildup of greenhouse gases (Easterling et al., 1997). The Mount Washington diurnal temperature range fell by 0.42°F over the 60-year period, but the change was not statistically significant. The famous Pic du Midi station located high in the Pyrenees (9,387 feet) does show a significant reduction in the diurnal temperature range over the past century (Bücher and Dessens, 1991; Dessens and Bücher, 1995), but high elevation stations in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria have shown no such significant reduction (Weber et al., 1994). The results from Mount Washington do little to settle any debate on this issue.

Obviously, Mount Washington is just one location on earth, and no one argues that it is some bellwether of global climate. But it is curious that this pristine location seems to show little-to-no response to the buildup of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases through the 20th century. And there appears to be no obvious compensating cooling effects that may have overwhelmed the warming effects of the increased concentrations of CO2. Ozone depletion, with its cooling effects (Hansen et al., 1998), would not impact a station closer to the equator than pole, atmospheric sulfate levels in the region have likely declined in recent decades (Hameed and Dignon, 1988; Husain et al., 1998), and solar radiation levels have increased over this period of data collection at the Observatory (Lean et al., 1995). The general lack of warming may be related to changes in atmospheric circulation or, possibly, some unknown microclimatic effect is masking the expected temperature increase. Or, just possibly, we are all expecting a bit too much from the much-ballyhooed increase in CO2.

Firure 1. Annual maximum, mean, and minimum temperatures (°F) at Mount Washington, 1989-1998.

References

Bücher, A., and J. Dessens, 1991: Secular trend of surface temperature at an elevated observatory in the Pyrenees. Journal of Climate, 4, 859-868.

Dessens, J., and A. Bücher, 1995: Changes in minimum and maximum temperatures at the Pic du Midi station in relation with humidity and cloudiness, 1882-1984. Atmospheric Research, 37. 147-162.

Easterling, D.R., B. Horton, P.D. Jones, T.C. Peterson, T.R. Karl, D.E. Parker, M.J. Salinger, V. Razuvayev, N. Plummer, P. Jamason, and C.K. Folland, 1997: Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe. Science,.277, 364-367.

Hansen, J.E., M. Sato, A. Lacis, R. Ruedy, I.Tegen, and E. Matthews, 1998: Climate forcings in the Industrial era. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 12,753-12,758.

Hameed, S., and J. Dignon, 1988: Changes in the geographical distributions of global emissions of NOx and SO2 from fossil-fuel combustion between 1966 and 1980. Atmospheric Environment, 22, 441-449.

Hildebrandt, M.L., and R.C. Balling Jr., 1998: Climate variability at the world's windiest weather station. Windswept: the Quarterly Bulletin of Mount Washington Observatory, 39, 34-40.

Husain, L., V.A. Dutkiewicz, and M. Das, 1998: Evidence for decrease in atmospheric sulfur burden in the eastern United States caused by reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions. Geophysical Research Letters, 25, 967-970.

Lean, J., J. Beer, and R. Bradley, 1995: Reconstruction of solar irradiance since 1610: Implications for climate change. Geophysical Research Letters, 22, 3195-3198.

Weber, R.O., P. Talkner, and G. Stefanicki, 1994: Asymmetric diurnal temperature change in the Alpine region. Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 673-676.