Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (67636)	8/4/1999 4:57:00 PM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577302

I guess Intel finaly pushed too hard. Mani

To: Wally Mastroly who wrote (67636)	8/4/1999 4:59:00 PM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1577302

Wally, <..and from the Intel front...: dailynews.yahoo.com; Thanks for posting this very good peice of news for AMD longs. I wouldn't have thought Intel would come through so well to help us. With enemies like this who needs friends ;-) Just yesterday, I posted my concerns about AMD's weakening position (short-term) in the laptop race. Now, AMD has a good shot at getting some nice design wins with 180nm K6-3s in this area. The key paragraph for me from the post is: "The delay dismays PC makers, who worry that product introductions late in the year will fall on deaf ears in the corporate market. Corporations, finalizing Year 2000 preparations, now will be unlikely to qualify systems with the new chip until after the new year." Boy, how things have changed in a year! Now, Intel is steadily gaining the reputation of a bumbling company that has a problem getting anything straight! Chuck