SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SSP who wrote (6656)8/6/1999 6:21:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 150070
 
Just counted, I'm not quite as bad as you, 28 total, but 3 of those are confirmed long terms holds, LOL by choice. Oh that doesn't count 3 that may or may not ever trade again, hey, we all make mistakes.



To: SSP who wrote (6656)8/7/1999 3:43:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 150070
 
One
Great
Performing
Stock

Arrggghhhh, I'm not even going to be able to watch, for even one moment, the trading on Monday.

And I so much wanted to be on hand, to see $4 fall, by the wayside.



To: SSP who wrote (6656)8/7/1999 3:51:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 150070
 
I think this little article fits in pretty well with the theme of the LISTS. You must excuse Perspectives, they don't have, a spell check, but then, I am reprinting it, without permission, so...

Perspectives Weekend Edition - Aug 6

Commentary
Buy on rumour, sell on news. A common cliche that often proves valid. This
week, I elaborate and outline how traders should react to news.

Speculators buy or sell stocks on expectations, they speculate on the
potential for changes in the fundamental value of the company by taking a
position before the news. When expectations are answered, they no longer
need to hold the position. The speculation is over, and they hope, the
gamble has paid off.

This is why more experienced traders often advise to sell on news. It is
the news that answers expectation, signalling the end of the speculators
role in the process. Once the news has arrived, the investors step in,
looking to hold the stock for the fundamental value that has now materialized.

With speculation comes uncertainty, which is why stocks tend to go higher
than the news warrants. When the news arrives and expecations are answered,
the stock tends sell off as the speculators move to the next deal and the
market works to correctly value the news. The stock often sells off more
than it is worth as everyone runs for the door at once, and then has to be
adjusted upward by the value seeking investors.

With this line of reasoning, we can put a caveat on the sell on news rule.
Simply, sell when expectations are answered. However, if news comes out
that creates new expectations, expect that the market will start to
speculate yet again.

If a stock has moved up in anticipation of news, and when the news arrives,
remains strong and refuses to go lower, you should ask if there are new
expectations causing the market to look ahead again. It is a bullish sign
if market activity is strong after news. There will be selling pressure,
but if the buyers are winning the war, then expect that the stock still has
potential to go higher. Expectations fuel the speculator's game.

Enough Said.



To: SSP who wrote (6656)8/7/1999 4:02:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 150070
 
To order, click here: tradersresource.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Daily Market Review

* Stocks opened sharply lower this morning after the Labor Department
announced a much greater-than-expected increase in job growth. Blue chip
stocks have been unable to shake interest rate hike fears, keeping the
Dow in negative territory for much of the session. The Nasdaq Composite
ricocheted between the plus and minus columns, most recently, hugging the
breakeven point.

As a result, The Dow closed with a loss of 0.74% or 79.79 points to
10,714.03. The Nasdaq lost 0.7% or 17.86 points to 2,547.97. The
Standard and Poor's 500 fell 1.02% or 13.42 points to 1300.29. The big
gray cloud that has been looming over the US markets in the past few weeks
got a little bit darker today. While much of the country is hoping for
rain to end one of the century's worst droughts, traders are hoping the
gloomy clouds on Wall Street will get swept to sea.

Share prices went down across the board, but small ones have lost less
ground in this turbulent period. We believe one of the reasons is that
since small ones went through a severe price correction last year, small
and large cap firms as a group have differences in their overall value, or
a 'valuation disparity'. The result is that small caps are appearing more
stable in times of market volatility. The Russell 2000 Index of small-cap
stocks was down 0.4% or 1.71 to 428.04, while the MicroCap 1000 Index lost
0.29% or 3.22 points to 1095.85.

* The Labor Department served up another piece of disheartening economic
data indicating wage pressures. July payrolls surged by 310,000 jobs,
greatly surpassing Wall Street consensus forecast for a 210,000 increase.
June's payrolls were upwardly revised to 273,000 jobs. Adding fuel to the
fire, the average hourly wage increased $0.06 to $13.29, its highest level
in seven months while the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%.

* Interest-rate concerns were magnified by today's jobs data, sending the
30-Year treasury plunging 1 6/32 to 87 26/32 while the yield soared to
6.15%. The US data held its ground in the today, closing modestly higher
against the yen and flat against the yen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



To: SSP who wrote (6656)8/7/1999 1:29:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 150070
 
otcbb.com



To: SSP who wrote (6656)8/8/1999 1:51:00 PM
From: CIMA  Respond to of 150070
 
From This Week's Pick:

Attention all Subscribers: Enclosed please find an excellent written
synopsis of various Internet frauds plaguing the World Wide Web. It sums up
in one letter much of the advise we have been giving our subscribers for
some time now. We thank "Heavy Trading Group" for posting it. (we couldn't
have written it better ourselves) Remember none of us are perfect, we may
post our findings, but we also rely on all of you to tell us your findings
and give us your opinions good or bad. Never be shy or afraid to ask
questions...........We encourage you to email us at
analyst@thisweekspick.com
Here's the synopsis. Thanx again Heavy Trader Group!

You should be skeptical of investment opportunities you learn about
>through the Internet. When you see an offering on the Internet ­ whether
>
>it's on a company's website, in an online newsletter, on a message
>board, or in a chat room ­ you should assume it's a scam until you've
>done your homework and proven otherwise. Get the facts before you
>invest, and only invest money you can afford to lose. You can avoid
>online investment scams by asking ­ and getting answers to ­ these three
>
>simple questions:
>
> Where is the information coming from?
> Where is the company listed?
> How long have they been in business and are they profitable?
>
> The Internet serves as an excellent tool for investors, allowing them
>to
>easily and inexpensively research investment opportunities. But the
>Internet is also an excellent tool for fraudsters. That's why you should
>
>always think twice before you invest your money in any opportunity you
>learn about through the Internet.
>
> The Internet allows individuals or companies to communicate with a
>large
>audience without spending a lot of time, effort, or money. Anyone can
>reach tens of thousands of people by building an Internet web site,
>posting a message on an online bulletin board, entering a discussion in
>a live "chat" room, or sending mass e-mails. It's easy for fraudsters to
>
>make their messages look real and credible. But it's nearly impossible
>for investors to tell the difference between fact and fiction.
>
> On October 28, 1998, the SEC announced charges against 44 stock
>promoters caught in a nationwide enforcement sweep to combat Internet
>fraud. These promoters failed to tell investors that more than 235
>companies paid them millions of dollars in cash and shares in exchange
>for touting their stock on the Internet.
>
>"Not only did they lie about their own independence, some of them lied
>about the companies they featured, then took advantage of any quick
>spike in price to sell their shares for a fast and easy profit," said
>SEC Director of Enforcement Richard H. Walker.
>
>This alert tells you how to spot different types of Internet fraud, what
>
>the SEC is doing to fight Internet investment scams, and how to use the
>Internet to invest wisely.
>
> How do these people reach you:
>
>Online Investment Fraud:
>New Medium, Same Old Scam
>The types of investment fraud seen online mirror the frauds perpetrated
>over the phone or through the mail. Remember that fraudsters can use a
>variety of Internet tools to spread false information, including
>bulletin boards, online newsletters, spam, or chat (including Internet
>Relay Chat or Web Page Chat). They can also build a glitzy,
>sophisticated web page. All of these tools cost very little money and
>can be found at the fingertips of fraudsters.
>
>Online Investment Newsletters
>Hundreds of online investment newsletters have appeared on the Internet
>in recent years. Many offer investors seemingly unbiased information
>free of charge about featured companies or recommending "stock picks of
>the month." While legitimate online newsletters can help investors
>gather valuable information, some online newsletters are tools for
>fraud.
>Some companies pay the people who write online newsletters cash or
>securities to "tout" or recommend their stocks. While this isn't
>illegal, the federal securities laws require the newsletters to disclose
>
>who paid them, the amount, and the type of payment. But many fraudsters
>fail to do so. Instead, they'll lie about the payments they received,
>their independence, their so-called research, and their track records.
>Their newsletters masquerade as sources of unbiased information, when in
>
>fact they stand to profit handsomely if they convince investors to buy
>or sell particular stocks.
>
>Bulletin Boards
>Online bulletin boards ­ whether newsgroups, usenet, or web-based
>bulletin boards ­ have become an increasingly popular forum for
>investors to share information. Bulletin boards typically feature
>"threads" made up of numerous messages on various investment
>opportunities.
>While some messages may be true, many turn out to be bogus ­ or even
>scams. Fraudsters often pump up a company or pretend to reveal "inside"
>information about upcoming announcements, new products, or lucrative
>contracts.
>Also, you never know for certain who you're dealing with ­ or whether
>they're credible ­ because many bulletin boards allow users to hide
>their identity behind multiple aliases. People claiming to be unbiased
>observers who've carefully researched the company may actually be
>company insiders, large shareholders, or paid promoters. A single person
>
>can easily create the illusion of widespread interest in a small,
>thinly-traded stock by posting a series of messages under various
>aliases.
>
>Consider all offers with skepticism. Investment frauds usually fit one
>of the following categories:
>
>The "Pump And Dump" Scam
>It's common to see messages posted online that urge readers to buy a
>stock quickly or tell you to sell before the price goes down. Often the
>writers will claim to have "inside" information about an impending
>development or to use an "infallible" combination of economic and stock
>market data to pick stocks. In reality, they may be insiders or paid
>promoters who stand to gain by selling their shares after the stock
>price is pumped up by gullible investors. Once these fraudsters sell
>their shares and stop hyping the stock, the price typically falls and
>investors lose their money. Fraudsters frequently use this ploy with
>small, thinly-traded companies because it's easier to manipulate a stock
>
>when there's little or no information available about the company.
>
>The Pyramid
>Be wary of messages that read: "How To Make Big Money From Your Home
>Computer!!!" One online promoter claimed that investors could "turn $5
>into $60,000 in just three to six weeks." In reality, this program was
>nothing more than an electronic version of the classic "pyramid" scheme
>in which participants attempt to make money solely by recruiting new
>participants into the program.
>
>The "Risk-Free" Fraud
>"Exciting, Low-Risk Investment Opportunities" to participate in
>exotic-sounding investments ­ such as wireless cable projects, prime
>bank securities, and eel farms ­ have been offered through the Internet.
>
>But no investment is riskier. And sometimes the investment products
>touted do not even exist ­ they're merely scams. Be wary of
>opportunities that promise spectacular profits or "guaranteed" returns.
>If the deal sounds too good to be true, then it probably is.
>
>Off-shore Frauds
>At one time, off-shore schemes targeting U.S. investors cost a great
>deal of money and were difficult to carry out. Conflicting time zones,
>differing currencies, and the high costs of international telephone
>calls and overnight mailings made it difficult for fraudsters to prey on
>
>U.S. residents. But the Internet has removed those obstacles. Be extra
>careful when considering any investment opportunity that comes from
>another country, because it's difficult for U.S. law enforcement
>agencies to investigate and prosecute foreign frauds.
>
>
>If you want to invest wisely and steer clear of frauds, you must get the
>
>facts. Never, ever, make an investment based solely on what you read in
>an online newsletter or bulletin board posting, especially if the
>investment involves a small, thinly-traded company that isn't well
>known. And don't even think about investing on your own in small
>companies that don't file regular reports with the SEC, unless you are
>willing to investigate each company thoroughly and to check the truth of
>
>every statement about the company. For instance, you'll need to:
>
>•get financial statements from the company and be able to analyze them;
>
>•verify the claims about new product developments or lucrative
>contracts;
>
>•call every supplier or customer of the company and ask if they really
>do business with the company; and
>
>•check out the people running the company and find out if they've ever
>made money for investors before.
>
>Be careful and Good Luck!!
>
>HeavyTrader & Team

---
If you like Thisweekspick.com vote for us at;
investorschat.com
---



To: SSP who wrote (6656)8/9/1999 7:18:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 150070
 
WAKE UP!! Where are all you eastern people this morning?

Looks like a beautiful day around Toronto.

I'll be locked up in a hotel meeting room all day, so keep the markets going for me.

Will check in later tonight.