Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (7857)	8/8/1999 2:38:00 PM
From: bearcub	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9818

you can demand what you like, ron, but the point remains, you do not get to define harrassment as all replies from everyone who happens to disagree with you, within the sacred halls of si. you see, disagreeing with you is not harrassment. and to agree with you isn't endorsement either. and ignoring you isn't eradication of your personal self worth. i again am stating for the record: i have not attacked you personally by race, religion, creed, physicality, career path, sexual preference, ethnicity, political affliation or anything remotely approaching personal matters. the closest thing to a personal comment i've made about you, today in particular, is to challenge your male claim to first hand personal experience with the feminine experience of menses in relationship to that experience for WOMEN and as it impacts their water usage needs gallon wise and y2k. one has to wonder why you didn't get all worked up over the simultaneous reference to the diaper washing needs of excreting male and female infants and their impact on y2k water usage, gallon wise. is there something particularly uncomfortable to you as a grown, married man regarding post y2k feminine menstration and their post y2k water usage needs? is it because laundry is an area you haven't planned for in your contingency water storage and purification preparations? if the later is the case, you should be thanking me, not threatening me with your wife's M-16 for expanding your awareness horizon, since i as another male, can probably discuss this topic with you easier than the feminine members of this thread. i find it most curious that when you can't reply logically to your misstatements and illogical contradictory posts, even the same day you write them, it appears to the casual onlooker that you get emotional, start name calling, and threatening people with M-16s. Then come cries of harrassment. no matter how many times you bait the trap, ron, i will not be eating your bait. like i suggested before, lighten up and go do something physical to release your tension at getting caught or embarrassed or whatever it is that has you in such a dither, my young friend.