SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (68403)8/11/1999 12:17:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578930
 
Re: "not the 67.2 W which you foolishly got from multiplying 1.6 by 42. "

What's so "foolish" about ohm's law? Maybe you should be asking how AMD can claim only 50W when the numbers seem to prove otherwise.

EP



To: Mani1 who wrote (68403)8/11/1999 2:47:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578930
 
Mani - re: "At 600 MHz, maximum power dissipation is 50 W, not the 67.2 W which you foolishly got from multiplying 1.6 by 42. I thought you would have a better grasp of this issue. Here are the specs according to AMD: Maximum power dissipation for 500, 550, 600, 650MHz is 42, 46, 50, and 54W "

It appears that AMD can't do their math - how do you explain the maximum power being less than Vcc * Iccmax ?

Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News