Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Killian who wrote (14091)	8/11/1999 5:19:00 PM
From: ALTERN8	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

The FCC is expected to file a brief in the case siding with the cable industry and arguing that only federal authorities can regulate such services. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Good news? YES. Thank You.

To: Killian who wrote (14091)	8/11/1999 5:19:00 PM
From: HandsOn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29970

This should result in some institutional buying Tomorrow at the least.

To: Killian who wrote (14091)	8/11/1999 7:48:00 PM
From: Educator	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 29970

"I'd say this is good news but who knows!" Hi Kevin- I read the Kennard quotes quickly the first time and saw some post replies that felt it was very good news. I thought I had missed something, so went back and reread it more carefully. In all honesty, I did not see anything that would move the stock. Kennard has maintained that viewpoint all along. The fact that he refused a probe doesn't kabash the open access issue, and won't stop future states/cities from challenging T. Personally, I am still recovering from Armstrong's statements: "AtHome's business of using cable modems to hook up Internet users might not be a 'great strategic fit' with Excite's web portal service." And later adding that ATHM should consider spinning off Excite. To me, those statements really undermined the Excite@Home game plan and pointed to possible strife among Armstrong and Excite@Home management. How could we as shareholders be told a few months ago the Excite/AtHome combination was such a wonderful strategic fit, and now hear it would be best for AtHome to go it alone? If Armstrong indeed made those comments in public, he pulled a real Brutus. This was not good public relations for Excite@Home. Armstrong's words also added credence to the rumors of Excite spin off talks. Then along comes rumors of T/AOL talks, and the knife is twisted in ATHM. I would like Excite@Home management to come public and reaffirm the company's direction. Right now I am clueless. If this post doesn't make sense, I apologize. I am just doing some aloud thinking. Good luck All! Ed