Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ORXX - Orex Gold Mines Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (439)	8/15/1999 12:18:00 PM
From: Laser	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2392

..this is some kind of code right?...you longs are conspiring against us....I see Chuca is talking rust....I don't like the looks of this at all.... ;-).

To: Ga Bard who wrote (439)	8/15/1999 12:44:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2392

Ga Bard, someone on another thread mentioned this stock. I tried to do some research with public information, but nothing on EDGAR, probably non reporting. All I find are PRs that show trading inconsistent with the apparent fundamentals. The trading of ORXX suggests a "floorless", or even naked short Reg S, or screwy preferred conversions going on. First blush would suspect company insiders. Reading the public threads for this stock is an exercise in futility, typical of Bre-x at the collapse. Even you that seems to have done good DD is getting sidetracked with legal nonsense over some posters. I know Tim to be honest even when wrong. However Laser's another story. <VBG> Chuca is impossible to understand, nobody will ever convict him. <VVBG> Back to the subject, how do you justify the divergence of the technical analysis and fundamentals? The excuse of shorts doesn't compute. It's financially dangerous to short a company with good fundamentals. What's wrong with ORXX?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (439)	8/15/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: Just-a-thought	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2392

Afternoon Gary, RE: Toy '67 Mustang' 1) Take a good magnet and rap it in a handerchief and run it all over the body to see how much metal is still under that paint job.......?? 2) Then check the space between both doors and their adjacent rear quarter panels...to see if is equal top to bottom if it is not consistent 'north to south' you probably have a frame/unibody stress/failure.....if so stay away. 3) If you really want it you could make him an offer then hire some 'naysayers' to visit his lot and nit-pick it to pieces!!!! jat