SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (51568)8/16/1999 11:28:00 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
it must be noted that the primary problem at the end of the twentieth
century is the misdirection of foreign aid dollars by tyrannical governments,


I'm not sure I would use tyrannical, but certainly the misdirection of foreign aid is significant. I don't know what percentage of our foreign aid goes to military aid and what percentage to food aid, but I belive it is seriously slanted in the former direction, whereas I think starving people would far rather receive food than have their governments receive more weapons.



To: Neocon who wrote (51568)8/22/1999 8:09:00 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 108807
 
<I disagree with the author about corporate farming, which is simply more efficient, nor
do I think that we can over- ride the responsibility of national governments to provide
for their citizens, unless we are willing to becoming a truly imperial power.>

You may disagree with the idea that corporate farming is not the most efficient way of feeding people, but do you have any proof to support your position? Certainly, family and community farm experiments all over the world are enabling people to eat, and doing it often organically or by intensive farming methods which produce more food per acre than corporate farming does, without the pollution or erosion of top soil that we have in present day large farming operations in America.