Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Ben Ezra Weinstein (BNEZ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BigDaddyMac who wrote (8674)	8/16/1999 7:27:00 PM
From: rjbac	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9391

Sounds as good as anything else I have heard Mitchell...I guess he deserves his money back before we do???Just two questions. Why are we at 30 million shares so that they/he needed to increase the authorized to do that debenture cash in(I realize we are just speculating)?Also, what happened to those 1st many MILLIONS of dollars/shares???? Take it easy... Bac

To: BigDaddyMac who wrote (8674)	8/17/1999 12:08:00 AM
From: E. Davies	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9391

Can you explain this theory about how the buying party needs 50% of the stock beforehand? I've never seen anything like that before. For "normal" companies, the buyer simply makes a public offer at a price. The shareholders vote to aprove or not. Since Jack & Mickey claim to have controlling interest (we dont have any proof-do we?) they dont need anything from us. So whats all this stuff about needing 50% ahead of time? I did own a stock once that was purchased under the market price. This was done by a "bonus" paid to the principle shareholder for signing over his stock. The rest of the shareholders got shafted. I smell a rat... (Not that there is anything we can do about it) Eric