SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kash johal who wrote (69026)8/17/1999 12:05:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576600
 
Re: "JC has the first Coppermine benchmarks comparing vs a PIII."

Who is JC?

EP



To: kash johal who wrote (69026)8/17/1999 2:12:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576600
 
<And the coppermines SUCK period.>

Tell me, Kash, why do say that? What did you expect from Coppermine?

Tenchusatsu



To: kash johal who wrote (69026)8/17/1999 2:28:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576600
 
kash - <Cumine sucks>

Wow. I didn't get that, although I would like to see some more detail, like, was this the production stepping of 820 and the uP, etc.

However, I surely don't get "suck" from the numbers form jc's.

Coupled with various other advantageous aspects of the Intel machine, I don't think K7 is going to be a runaway. Just my IMHO.

PB


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News