Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: secureit who wrote (33609)	8/17/1999 4:20:00 PM
From: Bruce A. Thompson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Secureit, Stop being such a penis and pay attention to what Dr. Z is telling you. The following is a list of stocks he has sounded the warning on in the past. Why he does it is not as important as that he does it in the face of such blatent harassment from dopes like you. (Zeev, thanks for being here!) To: +Timelord (511 ) From: +Timelord Monday, Jun 28 1999 11:18AM ET Reply # of 590 FLOORLESS REFERENCE LIST - Update 6/28/99 This provides a very simple and graphic illustration of how toxic these floorless instruments are. The comments from the shareholders speak for themselves. There are always many reasons why the stock will not be effected, and they repeat themselves over and over again. Until the SEC takes action and closes these loopholes, this is the only way to warn investors. Please take the time to listen. CTYS beta.iqc.com 206.253.217.14 206.253.217.14 IELSF beta.iqc.com 206.253.217.14 206.253.217.14 TTRIF beta.iqc.com 206.253.217.14 206.253.217.14 EXSO bigcharts.com GATE bigcharts.com. 206.253.217.14 AKSEF bigcharts.com. RNTK bigcharts.com. 206.253.217.14 AIPN bigcharts.com. CAFE bigcharts.com. CHTL bigcharts.com. HAYZQ bigcharts.com. TSIG bigcharts.com. While these companies appear to have survived a floorless issue for various reasons, and in a few rare cases, have recovered, the effect on their stock price is no less dramatic: ANCR bigcharts.com. ASTN bigcharts.com. FIBR beta.iqc.com. HEC beta.iqc.com. 206.253.217.14 VLNC bigcharts.com. Good luck.

To: secureit who wrote (33609)	8/17/1999 4:28:00 PM
From: Bald Eagle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

I was asking you to quit cluttering the thread with the same question that Zeev has already answered. All very good regards. <<Baldy...who's talking to you!!! >> BTW, usually a question is followed by a ? not !'s. :-)

To: secureit who wrote (33609)	8/17/1999 4:42:00 PM
From: Tom	Respond to of 44908

secureit: Zeev is a very busy man indeed! I am very concerned about his well-being. He appears to be working VERY HARD and is spreading himself quite thin...look at his past 20 days or so of activity - he is everywhere, spreading his vast knowledge. In reading over this cesspool of a thread upon my return from vacation, I was not surprised to find Mr. Hed continuing his misrepresentation of TSIGs current situation. For instance: Suzanne's below post, in which she pointed out that Zeev conveniently did not quote the entire section of the 8-K to support his contentions... Suzanne's post: Zeev, why didn't you quote the rest of the sentence from the 8-K? And the sentence following? Is it because it effectively nullifies your point? People, the rest of the story. "Pursuant to the settlement, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,402,923 shares of its common stock to Felcrest and the former officers and directors who had indemnification claims against the Company for the legal fees they incurred, while Mr. Gordon returned 4,402,923 of his shares to the Company for cancellation. Consequently, there was no increase in the outstanding shares of common stock as a result of the settlement.". . . . . . Did we get that? Gordon paid the company back for those shares. Zeev, why not tell the whole story here? Regards, Suzanne Or how about the following post from Zeev, in which he admittedly confused 6 months results with 3 months results...(an understandable error, when one is working as very hard as Zeev Hed!) The man needs a vacation folks!! Zeev's post: If you look at the latter,you will see that in the quarter ending June 30, the company's cash used in operation was $3,076,703, not the losses of about $1.5 MM nor the operational expenses of $1.7 MM. If you want to estimate what the cash burn rate will be in the current quarter, you'd better look at this $3 MM as a possible indication. Phil's response: I think you're mixing apples and oranges. The $ 3,076,703 Net cash (used in) operating activities was for the SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999. The 1,701,569 in Total Operating Expenses or the Net (loss) from operations of 1,536,659 are for the THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999. I am looking forward to Zeev soon dismissing any of the earnings associated with LL as a "one-time event"...LOL... Tom