SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Swift Energy (SFY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FloydP who wrote (873)8/18/1999 9:34:00 PM
From: wolfdog2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1602
 
Mark, I'll second Floyd's comments. Good post. <eom>



To: FloydP who wrote (873)8/19/1999 4:47:00 PM
From: Mark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1602
 
Folks,

I really appreciate the kind words but I think a disclaimer is in order.

I'd just like to make it clear that I am in exactly the same boat as many of the other folks here, and that I have no particular expertise in the O&G industry - so please don't read into my comments anything other than the thoughts of an amateur. I do have some experience in running a company (in technology) and am reasonably seasoned at thinking logically and long term. However, if anything that I say about O&G makes sense (!) then it is only because I have picked up the thoughts of all you folks (and the various others on the quality O&G threads). As such I think it is you folks who deserve a pat on the back......

Many thanks to all who post their thoughts and make these threads a great place for us all to learn.

Mark

p.s. Whilst yesterday's AGA's just about met expectations, the injection rates were again low, and the build rate needed to get to the Oct 31st target again climbed. We now need 73Bcf/week. It isn't going to happen. Especially as we still have some aircon days left, and we are entering the storm season (as PG pointed out). I'd now actually be a little surprised if any of the weeks left meet the needed average injection rate.