SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (69174)8/18/1999 10:06:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584419
 
Elmer, They do tend to be lower in cost than CPU's, but quite expensive and capable of good margins since they go everywhere and I think they are small in size? what is the die size of such a chipset? If it is small it can be profitable as long as it is high yield. If they have three times the yield and 1.3 rd the margin they are equal to the bottom line. They can make the wafers and job the others tasks out. I would have thought that the CPU maker would be best suited to dseign the chipset with the ability to fine tune the CPU and chip set for optimum, like Intel does. The dresden fab when running will it have the ability to make both the chipset and the CPU? Is there any need to make the chipset in copper for heat, speed etc reasons? If they have copper and Via does not what then for fast chipsets?

The chipset does seem to work quite well, slow bus, but that will change. Any Athlon product been bought by someone on this thread? yet?

Bill



To: Elmer who wrote (69174)8/19/1999 12:04:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1584419
 
Elmer - RE: "AMD doesn't need to waist the fab capacity on a low margin chipset."

Would you happen to know how much die space an average chipset takes up?