SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SBHX who wrote (6666)8/19/1999 2:15:00 AM
From: Craig Freeman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Scared, re: "the 'official' float of 16M". If you subtract institutional holdings (56.7%), the retail float is less than 1M shares.

insidertrader.com

When I posted this link previously, a few here questioned its accuracy (myself included) but to date no one has come up with any evidence to the contrary. Using Edgar and other public sources, I was able to account for ~86% of SNDK's shares as follows:

Insiders: 40.1%
Seagate 22.5%
Fidelity: 11.0%
Denver Invest: 6.2%
Dimension Fund: 6.3%

It's entirely reasonable that all other institutions together account for another 10%. Which means that if a relatively small group of guys got together for lunch, they could easily set the price on this stock. The only saving grace is that it's probably in their interest to see SNDK stay at as high a price as possible.

Craig



To: SBHX who wrote (6666)8/19/1999 6:27:00 AM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
On May 99, only 212 shareholders were on record.

Sacred, the shareholder of record numbers companies publish have been meaningless for years. It only includes the institutions that actually hold individuals' stock. For example, if 5,000 people at Schwab own SNDK, and all have Schwab holding the shares, the number shareholders of record for those shares is 1. Thirty years ago, when individuals held stock certificates, it was a more meaningful number.

Jay