Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Knight/Trimark Group, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Korn who wrote (3573)	8/19/1999 11:55:00 AM
From: blankmind	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10027

the chart again: OTCBB: Q199 - 14,847,000,000 Q198 - 6,880,000,000 Q299 - 25,514,000,000 Q298 - 8,763,000,000 Q399 - 9,300,000,000 (half-way) Q398 - 3,650,000,000 Q398 6,841,000,000 full in 1998, we expereinced the same slowdown, of 28%. hence, that is why i do not see this as the problem. instead for me the concern is nite is losing share. clearly nite knows they experience these slowdown in volume and and does compensate to smooth out earnings over the q's.

To: Gary Korn who wrote (3573)	8/19/1999 12:47:00 PM
From: blankmind	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10027

I a m t y p i n g s l o w l y . . . i have now spent the better part of an hour on this statement of yours. and the best i can do is this: i am ty (why are we discussing beanie babies?) ping (why flood the ty network and ruin the fun for all those kids who want to check out the latest bear news?) slowly....