SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles R who wrote (69335)8/20/1999 1:02:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Respond to of 1584071
 
Chuck - RE: "And, while you are at it, do you have spec numbers for HP8500-440MHz?

"in recent HP tests, the net integer performance of a simulation of the first Merced chip was 90% of HP's current 440-MHz PA-RISC 8500, and 85% of the 8500's ability to calculate floating-point operations"

ebnews.com "

specbench.org

Taking 90% of the SPECint_base score (that is the number we have of the Athlon) gives you 27.2, or only 2% faster than the 600MHz Athlon!

Granted we don't know the MHz of this simulation, and that this IS a simulation ("The tests were conducted to eliminate factors such as bus speed, using software that would isolate the performance of the CPU."), but the Athlon still holds it own!



To: Charles R who wrote (69335)8/20/1999 2:17:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584071
 
Re: "Now you are concerned about chipset yields? Why?"

Because that might explain the shortage of motherboards.

Re: "And, while you are at it, do you have spec numbers for HP8500-440MHz?"

specbench.org

That's the SPEC results. So you do the math.

EP