To: D & G who wrote (1722 ) 8/20/1999 2:00:00 PM From: Jacalyn Deaner Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2118
I am being facetious to the deal makers who are reading the boards and following me around. I am not selling, because they are going to give me that 5 bucks a share that goes along with the NASD listing; be it in GAAY or any other concoction they manufacture. All you have to do if you don't like the stock right now, sell and come back in later when you know what it is; the most important thing to do is save the stock purchase and sale receipts that indicate you were holding as of July 23, 1999 and incurred the wrath of manipulative parity. Something happened, insiders or loudmouths knew about it and now we shareholders are being blackmailed to go along with GAAY management. I say GAAY management, yes I do - try to contact Roger and you get referred to Joe Pittera's office. I can't tell anyone what to do, I know what I am doing and I know I am going to get parity with GMKT at this rate. GAAY is not what it was before this August 5, 1999 offering by ITCH and prior to that date July 23, 1999 when Murray and Wulff postings began to manipulate the stock price of gaay. This is just my opinion, but experts are looking at all this right now, and next week more information will be available - I have been on vacation this week, so have been slacking in my DD. Next week I pick up the slack and go talk with the experts. Will post when I get information; oh BTW Mr. Pittera has begun posting to me at RB quickly informing me that he never promised 5 bucks a share - however his insinuations regarding GAAY being listed in his public post last week on the ITHC board clearly indicates my gAAY is 5 bucks - he said it is very likely NASD, his insinuations and intents were clear, so now I am going to get my 5 bucks per share. here is the RB post by Pittera and my reply, glad all this is in the open now :) Dear Jacalyn, I appreciate your enthusiasm at this point but I have to correct some of your statements to set the record straight: (1) I never stated to anyone that the valuation of shares in GAAY or ITHC would be $5.00, and as a matter of fact I would never do that; (2) In addition I would never put anything in writing guaranteeing something like that. Other than that I appreciate your enthusiasm. Joseph Pittera. and my response: By: invisible1 Reply To: 29442 by jpittera Friday, 20 Aug 1999 at 1:42 PM EDT Post # of 29495 Dear Mr. Pittera, you DID promise me that my GAAY stock would be NASD by the end of the year - now that is about 5 dollars last time I looked. And you did write that in several places at various times. And when you told me you did not know who those RB posters were - and I would sent them to you ALL of them including WULFF - you told me in an email which I have archived, that you did NOT communicate with them. Today I have an email that says something different; and Wulff all along did tell me that he DID do business with you, even after you implied differently telling me you could not do anything to clean up the boards or get them from posting horrible malicious manipulative things about GAAY. Funny how times change, but the documents dont. I have to reread the release regarding ITHC and GMKT and I believe I read Mr. Olsen's name somewhere in that PR too. I wonder if GAAY Roger Asquith is still referring all GAAY questions to your office; seems to me that the email you sent to me indicating the 'blackmail' tactic is that if GAAY management is already going along with you, and if Mr. Olsen is referring GAAY shareholders to your office, well then the shareholders had better vote for the deal, otherwise, Mr. Olsen can just further gut GAAY? Thanks for keeping this out in the open and putting all the information and emails on the board for all to see, and just let me know where I am wrong this time. Looking forward to that NASD price on my GAAY - you bet I am enthused. Cordially, Jacalyn M. Deaner