SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: truedog who wrote (3779)8/20/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
truedog,

Are there "voices" who speak to you? They have misinformed you..my "cause" was simple. Two people should use the same definition.

FWIW: I agree with the following statements from your post..."There was no proven strategy of concealment. All the man did was refuse to answer a question. Had he lied about it, like Clinton, I would agree that a coverup occurred. How can a refusal to answer an unexpected question be a "planned effort"?"

I do have a minor problem with your last statement...it should hardly be an unexpected question at this point in time and I think that GW would plan a response; they doens't change the substance of the opinion so I included it within the area of agreeable.

The rest of your post is drivel.

Regards,
Jim



To: truedog who wrote (3779)8/20/1999 4:56:00 PM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
<< All you liberals are on the verge of panic and are pulling out all the stops regardless of how ridiculous they are. >>

We liberals are really panicing over George Snorter Bush's coverup of his possible drug usage.

Is it ridiculous to be wary of a candidate's first coverup happening even before the primaries begin? Usually a politician waits until he gets into office before trying to coverup misdeeds.

Whom can you trust?