SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : GAAY - Triangle Broadcasting Company (was TBCS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jon Scott who wrote (1731)8/23/1999 10:14:00 AM
From: Joe Lyddon  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 2118
 
Bingo! Check-out the New changes! Looking GOOD!

Play the game! Report any problems!
We are entering the last leg of practice play... Your participation is very important to uncover bugs & get them fixed before the big launch happens!

So, get on it! Play BINGO! Have FUN!

proactech.com!/
gets you direct to the site!

Joe



To: Jon Scott who wrote (1731)8/23/1999 2:31:00 PM
From: Theo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2118
 
For all the bluster and rhetoric tossed by those on the "other side of the tracks", it appears, so far, that their own base of support (shareholders of ITHC) are not nearly as confident as their self-appointed spokesperson(s). I would venture that most of ITHC's action and support is due to speculators as opposed to true investors. GAAY also continues a slow decent on relatively low volume, but, thus far, remains in a consistent albeit stagnant trading range. ITHC, on the other hand, appears to have peaked and is slowly withdrawing. All of which means nothing. Until plans are finalized/confirmed AND explained by management to shareholders on both sides, it will be (as you, Jon, have stated repeatedly and with just cause I might add) an investment based on a wing and a prayer.

Until I see written confirmation- nothing is for sure. In the meantime, I will read and be amused by the ongoing "good-cop/bad-cop" routine by Wulff and company, although, bringing up Mr. Olsens's health history was a faux pas IMO. Came across as a desperation attempt...failing instantly. Sympathy angle was a good ploy mind you, but the archetype/model used was a very poor choice and in bad taste- strictly my opinion of course. But, it does seem there is an obvious real interest in creating doubt in GAAY shareholder's minds as demonstrated by the methodology used by "other side" on Raging Bull. If you read just the ITHC poster's posts (I marked only theirs) over time, you see a pattern to the postings. Started out as passive/friendly, it was then followed by aggression, and then finally to indifference. Since then, instead of a united front, we have had a splintering of "basher"/personalities emerge which is not hard to do considering we are talking Raging Bull. This, IMHO, is the best subterfuge they have used. Instead of "our side/their side", we now have several entities to consider: {Wulff, Art, Deak, Bid-Ask, Joe P, and let's not forget the mystery lawyers/money bags behind the outift- and this causes those already in doubt to lean in the direction of the "basher"/poster they feel they can identify with. A variant of the divide and conquer procedure. I might also add that this seems to be getting accomplished with GAAY's blessing.

I find it disconcerting, to say the least, that all the while this episode unfolds, GAAY remains silent. GAAY has acknowledged ITHC more than once via P.R.s, but has not explained its relationship, nor the purpose, design and most importantly the INTENT. Calls to GAAY are forwarded to ITHC (Joe P.).

All this begs the question; WHY go to all this trouble and why the indifference on GAAY's part? Strictly an ITHC momo-play? Insider manipulation? There truly seems to be a concerted effort to undermine GAAY, and yet GAAY seems reluctant, nay, almost resigned to the idea . The purpose or intent and outcome remains a mystery, but, I sure hope we find out soon...

Theo;-)
It's too bad we can't all be "insiders"...