Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (69508)	8/22/1999 12:40:00 AM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573095

PB, <.18 should ultimately be capable of supporting >1GHz. Intel has published these estimates in the papers on their .18 process. I would think they had the Coppermine core in mind when presenting these estimates. > I think Intel had Wilamette in mind when they mentioned the 1 GHz estimate. But, doesn't matter - your opinion versus mine. <IMHO, you are generally underestimating both the .18 process capability, and the scalability of the Coppermine core. The [PPRO], even though it is mature, has demonstrated that it is an extremely scaleable design. Again, IMHO.> You may be right but I get my data points from several CPU savvy guys including some from Intel. Woudn't be the first or last time for me to be wrong. Let's see. Chuck