Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Buckley who wrote (5046)	8/22/1999 12:54:00 AM
From: DownSouth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

Mike, and thread, I appreciate the discussion this weekend, and, as you can see, I really am loosing sleep. I would appreciate some noble efforts from our most informed members to tell me (us) what is the downside risk re: QCOM. Let's talk some worst case scenarios. I am trying to bring balance to my thinking and am not well enough informed about QCOM and its domain to see as clearly as so many of you do, so your help will be most appreciated.

To: Mike Buckley who wrote (5046)	8/22/1999 3:14:00 AM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

>> if Qualcomm's stock performs as well in the first nine years of its tornado (beginning April 1, 1998), the stock will get to a little under $5000 by April, 2007. Not to be picky, but I thought your Cisco/Q post put Q at $19,500 per share in 9 years. Since that was pre-split, I've been using $10,000. Is my memory failing? Franq