Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony McFadden who wrote (8788)	8/23/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: Wildman262	Respond to of 11417

Many investors don't have the patience required to stay in the game for the long haul. Last year Wave traded $1-5, this year it has traded 5-20's, next year as the company deploys on a mass scale, the trading range will again move up. I hardly think this is a game of 'smoke and mirrors'. The stock price sucks as it well below it's recent highs, but the company is very much on track. Things eventually balance out. Long and loving it.

To: Tony McFadden who wrote (8788)	8/23/1999 9:18:00 PM
From: JEFFREY S. FENDER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

I don't think I have been negative on this stock. In fact in the past I told everyone I was trading it. Now I have taken a position in the last few months. I would bet also more substantial then most on this board. As I continue to do my DD I keep coming up with a lot of problems for wavx down the road. Of course the one expert I turn to (that also posts on this site) continues to explain is that wavx has accounted and thought out a lot of the negatives I come up with. However, When I continue to compare it to other internet stocks that have revenues and lose money WAVX does not even come close to what their potential should be. ARE you guys saying that you are all right and the experts on WALL STREET are wrong? What about that fund manager who is short wavx? What about the current stock price? What about the possibilities that WAVX will never deploy? I don't know, I sure hope you are all correct and I am wrong because then I still win Financially. It just amazes me that with so much WAVX seems to have they have a share price that does not even come close to rationality for the potential they are suppose to posses

To: Tony McFadden who wrote (8788)	8/23/1999 10:19:00 PM
From: ecommerceman	Respond to of 11417

I've been out of town and don't know if folks have read and analyzed this article about QPASS in Red Herring. redherring.com The article notes that: "The technology could be used to sell any type of digital content, including music, pay-per-view video, searchable databases, or computer games." Of course, they're a software-based system, with all of the inherent disadvantages implied (as well as the one advantage that they're not as dependent as we are on deployment), and the OEMs also get zippo from them--which remains our greatest and hopefully, telling, advantage.