SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stefan who wrote (47779)8/24/1999 8:09:00 AM
From: Graham C.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Here's a rough ( simplistic ) idea of how chip prices
may vary over time ...

The maximum size of a chip doesn't vary much over time,
so how much you can fit on a chip varies with the feature
size. If the feature size shrinks by 30%, you get twice as
much function per chip. ( 0.5 microns to 0.35 microns, say )

There is a cost associated with moving to a smaller
feature size - this may be relatively small, or it may be
large, depending on how much of the old equipment needs to
be replaced with upgraded equipment. This cost makes the new
chips more expensive initially but the effect wears off
with depreciation and maturity of that production line.

This may or may not be associated with a move to larger
wafers. Same wafer size means roughly same number of chips
per wafer; increased wafer size means 50% - 100% increase
in chips per wafer.

The cost per wafer would increase a little for same size
wafer, or maybe quite a bit for a larger wafer.

The bottom line is you get twice as much 'function' for
only a little more cost, or maybe 4 times as much function
for a moderate increase in costs, apart from the initial
capital investment needed to switch over.

Smaller features => more integration => more function per chip => more revenue per wafer => more profit ( or maybe that should be : more chance of survival )

128 Meg will be more cost effective than 64 Meg once the
initial capital investment is depreciated.



To: Stefan who wrote (47779)8/24/1999 10:08:00 AM
From: DavidG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Stefan,

You are getting a little silly. 16mb can only provide for a max 32mbyte module. Not a viable product anymore when most systems are now equipped with 64mbytes and higher.

Aside from that the 16mbit/16mbyte modules do go for a premium price since most manufacturers have abandoned them except for minimum production on a replacement basis for the older EDO systems.

DavidG