Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : 1ST MIRACLE GROUP (MVEE), founders last co. went $0.20-$46 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LegalBeast who wrote (4469)	8/24/1999 11:08:00 PM
From: Mark McNew	Respond to of 5541

BTW, if we pulled 4.7M on 1600 screens, then on 2600 screens we should have pulled 7.6M Not necessarily, sometimes people travel a distance to see a film, and in other cases it is showing on more that one screen in the same cineplex. For example my wife, and our friends and I traveled about 100 miles to see it. They had it on one screen while a couple of the other films were on 2 screens. It probably would have increased revenues, but not by quite that much. Mark

To: LegalBeast who wrote (4469)	8/24/1999 11:10:00 PM
From: Tim Davies	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5541

i agree.. given the number of theaters ..i think its doing great..and its just the first of many.. that latest book aquisition has a major character actors name writen all over it.. a hopkins as the mentor would be great.. i think that the long term internet plan just has to be to get control over good movies that will be seen on the internet as soon as the bandwidth will allow it.. i have a program " admitedly expensive" 6k usd, that will allow me to view up to a tera byte image on the net, and can have 2k people online at a time.. when this compresion is put in a chip and put ona vidio board it can live decode 30 frames per sec at dvd resolution... the point is that the tech is comming to the market, and mvee will own the movies ..imo tim