SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ken Benes who wrote (39598)8/25/1999 6:44:00 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116822
 
Ken:

Your 4:46 post was right on the money. If the mining company managements had the shareholders' best interests in mind they would be consolidating big time and CUTTING PRODUCTION SHARPLY just like the aluminum, copper, and oil industries are doing. Instead of hedging at 20 year lows as the shorts continue to laugh all the way to the bank

True. many miners are not financially strong enough to cut production for any length of time. Hence the need for massive industry wide consolidation. Once the mining industry can credibly threaten to slash production by 20-30% for an extended period the the shorts and bullion banks may well back off without the industry actually having to cut output.



To: Ken Benes who wrote (39598)8/25/1999 6:49:00 PM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116822
 
Ken - what nonsense you spout!! Of course the producers don't have a vested interest in keeping the price low! In an Alice Through the Looking Glass world this may not be so - but not in the real world. Nothing could be better for the producers than a rise in the POG - some hedgers are more flexible than others of course. I'm amused by your description of me belonging to the 'rah rah' crowd - find one post where I've said that the POG will go up. d