Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (3298)	8/26/1999 1:21:00 PM
From: Dr. Voodoo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

And an even hand should prevail. The real issue of getting banished isn't poster's behavior. Its in saying that you intend to set up a discussion site to compete with them. For this your posts get poofed. And heaven forbid that it might be better. This is in no way intended as advertisement Mr. SI BOB. part of this site you can figure out is the reason that links disappear >>>>suite101.com/discussion.cfm/investing/24603/latest/4<<< If you post it to anyone poof they go. This one should be slightly time delayed as SI BOB will have to find it the old fashion way. By digging through my posts! V

To: DanZ who wrote (3298)	8/26/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: Hank	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10293

What Bill Wexler or anyone else says about any company on these threads is only libelous and illegal if what they say is proven false. Neither you nor any of Bill's many other detractors has ever accomplished this. Furthermore, if what he said in the past was truly libelous, then why hasn't he been sued for every penny he's got by the companies and management he's supposedly slandered? The fact that he hasn't makes me think that the companies and managers he's attacked are afraid to get into a battle with him because they know that most of what he says is true. The last thing you want if your an underhanded CEO etc. is to have that fact proven in a court of law. It looks like you and your comrades have finally gotten to poor Bill. It's really to bad. He was one of the few posters on SI that had a decent track record. I hope that hypsters like you are satisfied with what you've done to SI. You can bet that there will be far fewer ears around to listen your crap in the future, myself included. Perhaps in the future you can convince the a**holes that run this site to submit questionnaires to anyone that wants to become an SI member. That way, you could censure applicants and choose only those that have the same opinion as you. What a wonderful world we live in.

To: DanZ who wrote (3298)	8/27/1999 12:34:00 AM
From: Marconi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Mr. Zimmermann: why, why, why, why? Why oh why do I keep muttering idiot when I encounter your namesake posts? No amount of your mistaken views adds up to one sensible point! Bill's a savvy kid--entertainingly colorful, and a successful investor to my understanding. I will add that I believe seasoned investors generally exhibit the grace to accept BW's theatrics in stride, with delight in his substance. He's a gem. Slightest regards, m BTW--rhetorical questions are not intended to be answered.