SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (69999)8/26/1999 2:03:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573544
 
<be a lot better for heat dissipation>

You are a truly selective reader today.
Michael has asked you a simple question:

"if .05 is such a small percentage, why
did intel up it in the first place ?
Maybe because 2.00 was to little to let
the majority of the cores run at 600 ?"

but you (and PB) replied with BS. Not good.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (69999)8/26/1999 2:58:00 PM
From: Michael DaKota  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573544
 
re : You have to admit, a jump from 2.2 to 2.4 volts is bigger than the jump from 2.0 to 2.05 volts.

Give me one message where I state that the jump from 2.2 to 2.4 was a sign of "good yields"

You wont, because I never said so, and it ISNT so.

Just face the fact that AMD had bad yields, upped the voltage to get to higher MHz.

Intel is doing the same now, why is that so hard to see?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News