Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Diamond Entertainment Corp (Previously DMEC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (5916)	8/27/1999 2:21:00 AM
From: ETS/316	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6957

KG4, I hope those answers were good enough for you, now you can move on. You know every since I've been in this stock since 96 I have been reading SI and always saw you on this thread as an loyal DMEC'r. You really surprise me with your posts these days especially after the way you attacked Elio a couple months back. Cola made some valid points about you not acting this way when you was an investor of DMEC. Makes me wonder what your real motives are. I hear you say you are looking for answers but the way you ask them is also bashing the stock. You sit there and post all negatives because you dont know, but yet no positives about what the company is doing. Why??? Like someone posted a couple days ago, if you are out of a stock delete the symbol from your "favorites" section and move on. If you feel the need to monitor it for possible re-entrance then monitor it until you feel comfortable enough to get back in. Think about the way you treated Elio and look at yourself now. Why should a person even want to hear what you have to say. A lot of new investors might not know your history so they would not understand why the longs here are upset with your recent behavior but it is all here on this board. KG4, I dont want you to think that I am another ..... calling you a basher or anything I am just an "investor protecting my investment" with my comments, sounds familiar. Seriously now, you say you were searching for answers and valid ones I might point out but I know everytime I have posted to Gary he has always responded. Gary has responded to your questions in a fairly reasonable amount of time, are you telling me that you could not have simply called him (as he ask every investor with concerns to do ) with these questions. Dont say that you have because I wont believe you and Mr. Swancey will be reading the board. This brings me back to your intentions. If your once loyal to a stock and made out with "some profits" you will either leave it along or do your own DD on your own time. Dont try to trash the stock with your unanswered questions. There is a lot going on for this company now and we can all see them. The specifics are a concern, YES! but revenues and profits are what I and sure most investors are interested in. The last Q was at no surprise to most and clearly noted, so most what was seen there about revenues was no shock. Gary has also told us numerous times the reason why the Company names and/or symbols are not in the PR's. If they were mentioned and then lost the deal think of how DMEC would look to you as an investor. Try something for me, talk about what's been happening after June 30th....How do you think November financials will look? How do you think revenues will look? The deals they announced so far is already doing fairy better than the last quarter and this is just the beginning of DMEC's busy part of year. I am not trying to hype the stock in any way or form cause I still have a lot of concerns but the future looks very positive for DMEC, granting they accomplish everything that they have stated. I nor you can predict that so we all wait and see. You made a decision to cash out on DMEC with a profit I might add so why hang around.....Brings me back to your intentions/motives. Good Luck to you and all DMEC longs!!!!!!! ETS

To: Ga Bard who wrote (5916)	8/27/1999 8:42:00 AM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6957

Gary, Thanks for taking the time to get back to me. I really don't wan't to get started on all this today, so I'll keep it brief. I certainly understand the reasoning that certain info is proprietary and/or confidential to the business. However, most of the questions I have asked, do not fit that category and certainly could have been answered with something more then " it is confidential ". Essentially, this question and answer session only legitamized one of my biggest concerns and that is the evasiveness of the company. Yes, I understand some stuff is best to keep quiet, but most of the stuff I ask is non-proprietary info, and it must make one stop and think why they would be so evasive about certain things. Anyway, have a great day...I appreciate you trying to help in fiding some answers and am well aware your just a middleman/pawn in this and are at James' mercy. Hopefully his reasons for doing things as he is, will pay off in the long run a nd help in turning this company around. I suppose all one can do now is sit back and see what the future brings. Good Luck KG