Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Truth about Waco -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (241)	8/31/1999 2:19:00 PM
From: Merritt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1449

TP: <<Her role is much like J.Kennedy at the Bay of Pigs, suddenly confronted with a secret mission and a quick decision.>> In the Fall of 1960 I attended a rally at my college whose sponsors put forth the thought, which seemed absurd to me at the time, that the U.S. government, through the auspices of the CIA, was arming Cuban refugees (ex-Batista supporters) so that they might invade a small island off the Cuban shore, the Islas del los Pinos. They would then set up a provisional government, and radio for U.S. assistance. That was almost a full year before the Bay of Pigs fiasco on the Isle of Pines. If the Fair Play For Cuba committee knew about it so far in advance, I really don't think JFK could plead ignorance - neither do I feel ignorance is any excuse (or even a viable reason) for Janet Reno's handling of the Waco affair.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (241)	8/31/1999 2:42:00 PM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1449

What I said may have went over your head, but I'm not missing the point pal. I was involved with Waco about day 3 after the botched reversal. Reno may have been hood winked at first , but she had plenty of time to figure that out. I was in her corner early on, and I tell you she had a choice of who she took advise or even suggestions from, I helped give her that choice, she ignored the obvious and started stone walling every one who told her anything she didn't want to hear. I know that for a fact up front and personal. I couldn't understand it, so I started digging and it turned out she had a hidden dark side , one that eventually made her putty in the hands of the same type of inner circle of those who helped kill and or coverup the assignation of J.F.K. She had her chance friend, and it was her who said "the buck stops with me" , while I don't see it exactly taht way she don't need anyone defending her, and if you have any hope that she will do one damm thing to get to the bottom of this , you have missed the point. She has set herself up as the public defender of the Killers and has gone to far now to back out. Your still dreaming "the dream I use to entertain" if you think there is a snow balls chance in hell that she will do anything meaningful towards getting to the bottom of this. She has betrayed her sacred trust, and she can't ever undo that as she just don't have it in her to change. She's not big enough to say I was wrong, she belongs to the camp of little people who always have to fault the other person when they screw up. I don't know if we can impeach an Attorney General but if we can she needs to be impeached, she has aided in the cover up and has used her position to obstruct justice by blocking appointments of an independent investigation, and signing onto a policy that has most of the real evidence, still buried ( evidence that she now knows that if it comes to light will show her for what she is by what she tried to hide .) -------------- Did you ever hear the saying "We are as sick as our Secrets" well it's true, and I'm convinced she has some really sick ones. You won't get at the real killers if you don't get her out of the way. Jim