Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scarecrow who wrote (26)	9/1/1999 1:12:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

Thanks. Well said. JLA

To: Scarecrow who wrote (26)	9/1/1999 1:42:00 PM
From: MNI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6418

Scarecrow, try persuasion. You crow to scare me, I am not impressed. Otherwise you over-interpreted me. I did not say the state knows anything about children. Some teachers do. Some don't. Most do work better if the pupil's parents offer help, or information, or care to ask for information. Others don't. School is an endangerment to children. Maybe we should choose to let our children go by without it. However JLA didn't choose so. I did never say thoughts were illegal. Where did you take that from? I tried to interpret JLA. Maybe I did it wrong. Okay. School cannot avoid morals education. Going to school is always morals education. Kids are exposed to the morals claims of their peers, and sometimes to high peer group pressure. Whether morals should or shouldn't be a subject (or done within one) is the question whether morals education should be done openly, giving teachers a say on morals, or as a covered action by your kid's buddies and foes. I think the first option offers more control for parents, not less. Anyway civics is morals, too. fwiw MNI