SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: waverider who wrote (39394)9/1/1999 6:51:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
>>QCOM has a long way to go before reaching the market cap it has the potential to.<<

i guess this sums up the difference between myself and most investors these days. i take potential and multiply by a probability factor.

most folks take potential and multiply by 1 (100% probability).



To: waverider who wrote (39394)9/1/1999 7:12:00 PM
From: Don Edgerton  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
If Q has an analyst meeting next week, why was it meeting with an individual analyst this week?

If the company gave him "insider" information on the earnings prospects, it is grossly unfair.

Did analyst lower his estimates? To kill a stock because it won't beat estimates by as much as in the past when it has short term supply not demand factors is irrational.

If MOT and Nokia cut prices and sell more phones, gross margins may decline on the supply limited phones Q sell, but royalties should increase. Don't believe MOT is selling chip sets externally yet. Does anyone know if NOK gets chip sets from Q?

MER analyst model already has decline in market share on chip sets built in. Thinks royaties from Asia should offset decline in gross margin.

JDSU took a recent haircut after a run which I missed. After faltering a couple of days it is on its way back.

Noticed ERICY got a CDMA contract in Brazil. More royalties for Q? This is for fixed wireless. Buildout starts by year end. 75% pops coverage. Low phone penetration rate for land lines make this a strong competitor as I see it.



To: waverider who wrote (39394)9/2/1999 8:13:00 AM
From: Lucretius  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
wrong thread