SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (70733)9/2/1999 4:11:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574059
 
TWY - Re: "If I'm wrong on this, I'll admit it on the thread but I am not ready to concede anything yet."

The media report says it's a 0.18 micron process.

Do you have any source that says it is a 0.25 micron process?

Paul



To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (70733)9/2/1999 5:26:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574059
 
WATSONYOUTH - < Also, .15um Leff in .18um groundrules?? Intel is doing better than that in .25um groundrules. >

Do you know what Leff_n is for the current .18 process? It's pretty unbelievable.

I mean, I really didn't believe it when I saw the number. But I am assured by those who are smarter than me that the number is real, and the calculation (based on measurement of C ) should be pretty close to how everyone else is doing it.

PB


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News