SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sunny who wrote (5872)9/2/1999 6:39:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Sunny,

If Intel is so important to RMBS and RMBS is going to be such a dominant factor in the growth of high
performance, Why do you think Intel is not making an effort to acquire them?


Intel lost their shirt in the DRAM market in the mid 80's and bailed out of that business, probably forever (if there is such a thing as forever in the electronics business). They won't touch any DRAM company, even Rambus, with a ten foot pole. Also, the "why buy the cow when you can get the milk a lot cheaper" theory applies. FWIW, the fact that Rambus, even with their patents and royalties, is still a DRAM company, has kept it out of my portfolio. Too commodity for me.

Tony



To: Sunny who wrote (5872)9/2/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Sunny,

That's a very good point. I think it really speaks to the "discontinuous innovation" nature of the RMBS architecture. INTC has over 80% of the chip market. They would have difficulty with the SEC if they establish a new chip format using RMBS, then acquired them. Remember, RMBS is an IP company and they will get a royalty on each RMBS chip. Imagine INTC trying to pull that off.

bp